I am a landscape social scientist in the Department of Environmental Science and Management at Portland State University. My research examines wildfire risk management from a coupled human-natural systems perspective and is focused on where, how, and with whom fire-prone regions in the Western US are collaborating to address wildfire risks. I employ a variety of quantitative techniques in my work including network analysis, social surveys, spatial statistics, data visualization, and participatory mapping. I pride myself on collaborative, interdisciplinary research and varied approaches to applied research. My research has shaped national policy on wildfire risk including the 2019 Shared Stewardship Strategy and the 2022 Wildfire Crisis Strategy.
Wildfire risk is more likely to spans social boundaries as wildfires grow in size. Looking at hundreds of thousands of wildfires helps to understand who owns the risk, where the risk comes from, and who needs to collaborate with who. We analyzed wildfire transmitted from western US national forests into communities and matched community exposure archetypes to national wildfire policy.
Simulated growth for a single wildfire based on fuels, topography, and weather. Fires readily cross social borders, like the one shown on this map, creating the need from co-management across boundaries.
All things equal, risk mitigation activities are most effective in high risk-areas. Combining the burn perimeters from several thousand fires reveals where risk is concentrated. Burn probabilities can be developed at local, regional, and continental scales.
Wildfire hotspots show that risk exposure is concentrated in geographic pockets. Differences in development, fire regimes, and geographic context indicate where specific risk management strategies are most effective. For instance, fuel reduction is only viable in those areas fo the map colored green and blue.
Ecosystems services describe the relationship between ecosystems and society by estimating the value of certain ecological goods and services. I authored several papers examining the field of ecosystem services in practice. In Ecosystem Services as a Boundary Object, we argue on the one hand the role of ecosystem services as a social boundary objects that facilitates transdisciplinary collaboration. In the Ecosystem Services of Novel Ecosystems, we find that studies of novel ecosystems find enhanced services far than typically assumed.
Boundary objects allow people from different communities to communicate and collaborate. Ecosystem services are one such boundary object. Some facets of ecosystems services (e.g., monetary value) can be standardized, and given time, form into background 'infrastructure'. Residual aspects can form new boundary objects.
Many ecosystem services are found in highly modified landscapes. While many assume that novel ecosystems are inherently degraded, we found in this review that a surprising number of ecological studies find services from novel ecosystems were enhanced.
Advances in social network analysis has opened up ways of understanding landscape processes. Combining social and ecological networks, network science provides a means for quantifying fit (or scale-mismatch). I combine social surveys of wildfire management networks with simulated wildfire transmission networks to understand what factors enable or inhibit cross-boundary fire management and how those factors vary among wildfire risk hotspots in the western US.
Both society and ecosystems can be described using as networks. Interactions between society and the environment are particularly interwoven in social-ecological systems. Given the social and ecological importance of many of these environments, social-ecological networks can provide insights into how these systems are structured and where certain elements may be misaligned.
The wildland-urban-interface (WUI) is a prime example of a coupled human-environmental system. This animation shows the structure of professional relationships.
Changes in landscapes are difficult to grasp. Geospatial tools make these changes discernable. Participatory geospatial tools have a long history in public engagement, and growing map literacy increases the potential use of these tools. I co-developed an interactive agent-based-model of landscape change in the southern Willamette Valley, Oregon, which included tools to compare future landscapes across thousands of potential futures. I also use technology to better involve the public in research.
Re-envision was developed in R shiny to explore scenarios produced through Envision, an agent-based-landscape change model that has been used in multiple NSF CNH grants. This tool was built alongside Envisionr, which converted each scenario into a multidimensional array that could be used to store and analyze Envision runs.
Point-it-out is a JavaScript plugin for Qualtrics that allows survey respondents to use an interactive mapping application to report spatial data as part of the questionnaire. The plugin has been used to collect work locations for wildfire risk and urban environmental stewardship but is also adaptable to other applications.